Categories
articles

A Little Diary from the School for Life

 

Prof. em. Dr. Jürgen Zimmer

A LITTLE DIARY FROM THE School for Life – PART I

14th February to 15th March 2012

 

14th February

 

If you want to enter the Royal Forest to find the School for Life, you have to turn right when you exit the highway which leads from Chiang Mai to Chiang Rai and then on to Mae Sai and the Burmese border. After a few hundred meters there is a checkpoint, though no one is actually checked: the barrier is simply lifted and greetings exchanged. The narrow street runs past a small lake, a reservoir with a water level which rises or falls depending on the time of year. The road becomes unpaved, and in the rainy season a shower of mud is churned up by the wheels, while in the dry season – depending on how fast you drive – it is a banner of dust which rises up behind the vehicle.

 

The best vehicle to have around here is a pickup. You see pickups with crowds packed inside and boxes or bales piled several meters high above the cab, so that I increase my distance from such skyscraper vehicles if following them around a corner, worried that they might not only swing wildly from side to side, but even overturn. Motorbikes are loaded even more adventurously: light motorcycles which force every driver to check their wing mirrors time and time again. Three or four people on a motorbike, with a baby wedged in between? “No problem!”. A tower of goods of some description behind the driver, which he holds onto with one arm whilst trying to steer with the other? “Also no problem!”.

 

But somehow there is a problem. The fact that one of the most popular subjects for Thai pop-songs (alongside falling in love, having a broken heart, and being ready for someone new again) is the motorbike accident, is a telling sign. We recommend volunteers to drive their motorbikes on the defensive, and to watch out for the hot exhaust pipes which can cause painful burns to the shins.

 

All is quiet on the small road through the Royal Forest. The pace slows down. A sign points to the “School for Life”. Three kilometers later, a left turn. The farm emerges, bearing the name “Suan Sai Suoi Fha” – “Light Sky Over Beautiful Garden”. Children come running, laughing, and greet us with a Wai – the traditional Thai greeting – and want to carry the luggage, and I think to myself that it’s the same as ever. And I feel at home.

 

15th February

 

At around 4:30am, the first cockerel crows. Shortly after this comes the collective howl of the dogs, though there is no full moon to be seen. Then it stops abruptly, as if lightning has struck. Then comes the solitary yap of one dog, but this receives no reply. All is quiet again.

 

At 6am, the temple bell is rung. Wake up! Morning has broken. By 7am it is lively. Every child belongs to the “cleaning the campus” team. The big dry leaves of the teak trees are collected up, later to be laid in heaps and used to grow mushrooms. Brooms are swung, and a babble of voices and children’s songs rings out from all corners of the campus.

 

At around 9am, Kru Ya comes running in, the Vice Principal who has been at the school for many years. She rubs her arms and shakes herself. She has goose bumps. I ask her if she’s cold. No, comes her answer – there’s a ghost in the school office! The shadowy face of an unknown child had appeared at the window. All the teachers who had been in the room had left in a hurry and rushed outside. Someone fetches a laptop. On the screen is a photo showing the back of the head and shoulders of a teacher sitting at the table, and at the window is an unrecognizable face.

 

Meanwhile, the incident has circulated amongst the children. A dense cluster surrounds the laptop that sits on a table in front of the farmhouse. Kru Ya and I speak about how in two days’ time, a ceremony is planned in front of the four spirit houses which are dotted about the campus. Kru Ya says she saw the ghost itself, not just in the picture.

 

A few hours later, Kru Tomsri (‘Kru’ means ‘teacher’) comes in and admits to the teachers that the ghost appeared for educational purposes. She had produced it on her laptop, touching up the photo of the office in such a way that it appeared to show a ghost. She had told the children that they would bump into ghosts if they roam around at night instead of going to bed. Now the teachers wouldn’t have to chase the children back into bed – they would go to bed like good children. Good, huh?

 

Kru Tomsri differs from Western parents who might threaten disobedient children with the bogeyman despite not believing in him themselves. No, Kru Tomsri believes in ghosts, as do all of the other adults – except for one who believes nothing of the sort, and wishes to dispense with spirits, angels, Buddha and reincarnation too, for that matter.

 

16th February

 

Around 7 years ago, two comic advertisements appeared in the German Journal “Course Book”, financed by the publisher. One of them featured a person in a space suit, in front of a spacecraft. The text said “Tula Bpor-Wai, installing the first solar panels on the moon in 2026. Tula Bpor-Wai is one of over 60 Thai children at the School for Life…”. The other advert pictured someone in a doctor’s overall with a syringe in their hand. The text said: “Darin Sri-ma, developing the first remedy for Parkinson’s disease in 2028. Darin Sri-ma is one of the children at the School for Life…”. The text ends by asking the reader to support the project. Even if Tula doesn’t build solar panels on the moon or Darin doesn’t find the cure to Parkinson’s, both comics express the core of what the schools are about: helping children emerge from the shadows of society and proceed as far forward as possible.

 

Today, 19-year-old Put came to the farm from Chiang Mai. He spoke to the young people in 9th grade who are about to decide whether they will go to Senior High School in the nearby town of Doi Saket, to Vocational College in Chiang Mai, or if they will do something else. Put has a suggestion: they could become grooms and work either in stables with thoroughbred horses or at a vet’s, or in a polo club. Put shows them photos of other graduates of the School for Life who, like him, have completed the groom’s training and are already, after a short period, earning as much as teachers. Photos of thoroughbred horses, photos of the polo club in Pattaya, photos of how horses are bandaged, harnessed and ridden, and of the grooms’ accommodation and their leisure time – going fishing, for example.

 

Having started his training two years ago, Put is now leading the project on the grounds of Chiang Mai University. He has also received a grant to train in Germany at the Marbach Stud Farm and become a farrier. With competition horses like those in Thailand, this is a profession that places high demands.

 

In Thailand, there is a great demand for grooms, and the School for Life – in collaboration with the veterinary faculty of Chiang Mai University – is the only educational institution in the country to provide a groom’s training. Both girls and  boys are welcome. The project was launched two years ago by Dominique Leutwiler, the General Manager of the School for Life and herself an avid rider. And her joy about Put and Ott and all those who want to make something of themselves in this profession is clearly visible.

 

18-year-old Ott was a ‘bad boy’ who stole and threatened to drift into the drugs scene. After his groom’s training, however, he developed his skill as a polo player. The high-end polo club in Pattaya is now sending Ott –  a talented rider – to Argentina for a few months to train him as a professional polo player. The club is planning to send Ott to play in the Thai national polo team in the future. This is breaking news for the School for Life! From ‘bad boy’ to international polo player: a story that we hope for in many variations.

 

19th February

At dawn, a small procession moves towards the four spirit houses. Each is home to the souls of the ancestors who, on this day when many birthdays will be celebrated, are to be honored with gifts: two cooked chickens, mandarins, mangoes, juice and water are left on the verandas of each of the four houses. As one of the birthday boys for whom a party is to be held in the evening, I accompany the group of teachers on their tour. Kru Non, the teacher for Thai classical dance, is the master of ceremonies. We meditate in front of each house, and incense sticks are lit and stuck into the gifts.

 

The walk around the grounds shows the progress being made in organic agriculture: a greater area of land is now being cultivated, along with more village life, especially in the lower part of the grounds by the creek, where a small embankment dams the water and fish are being farmed. Nearby, water buffalo are grazing, and Somchart the farmer has turned his cottage into a small farm. At a small bridge that crosses the creek live Sampan and his wife. Sampan is one of the veterans of the School for Life in Chiang Mai, the foreman of the construction and maintenance team which installed the first sanitary facilities and laid the cables and water pipes after the Tsunami on the site which later became the Beluga School for Life; it was there that he fell in love with Noan, whom he married and took back to the North.

 

After the ceremony at the fourth spirit house down there by the bridge, Kru Non tells me that there are actually six rather than four, and that we will now go to the fifth and sixth spirit houses. I can’t remember there being any more, and so assume there must be some new ones. We walk from the creek at the East of the site back up hill to the entrance in the West and come to a halt in front of the school office. A stool is placed at the window where the ghostly child’s face was seen on Kru Tomsri’s laptop screen, and is then covered with the same gifts which were dedicated to the souls of the other spirit houses, followed by the same ceremony.

 

To be on the safe side, a second chair is placed at the far right of the main entrance, along with the gifts, and a final ceremony takes place. Better safe than sorry. Who knows whether the Tomsrian spirit which Kru Ya seemed to see even without a computer doesn’t exist after all. In any case, the twelve teachers are convinced by the little procession. This reminds me of the comment of one Thai, who said he wouldn’t hang up the 2012 School for Life calendar, which pictures exorcisms and rituals, because the spirits might come out from the pictures and cause trouble.

 

At around 9am, the large room in the farm house is emptied and the adjacent room with the Buddha statues is prepared for the visit of five monks. In Thailand, celebrating birthdays is more about honoring the mother than celebrating the person whose birthday it is. When all the children have gathered in the room and the monks have settled, I remember about this custom of honoring the mothers, and tell them about my mother. She was expelled from her family because of her unmarried relationship with my father, who later died in Russia. Her brother, who was a captain and a pentathlete who had been in training for 1940 Olympic Games which were no longer held, and who soon died in France, could have been dishonorably discharged from the army. I tell them how we survived the war living in a shack without electricity and water, collecting moldy white bread which the occupying forces had thrown away, and sorting out the parts which were edible. I also told them about the weeks before my mother’s death, in which she organized a concert for peace. With the donations which were collected at this concert, we founded the School for Life.

 

The chanting of the monks, which the children join in with, the Christmas festivities, the Thai New Year Festival Songkran, the visits to temples, the church service in the little wooden church nearby, the honoring of the Ancestors: the farm is an ecumenical amalgam of exploratory movements, all contributing to peace between the religions. I resonate with the faithful, with the intersecting fragments of religion and myth, and with our monks from the temple of Lamphun. We discourage missionary efforts, whether they come from the Buddhist-robed operators of “temple businesses” or fundamental Christian sects that approach us with their aggressive marketing and throw their spare change to the poor.

 

By late afternoon, the festival begins on the meadow at the edge of which HRH Princess Maha Chakri Sirindhorn of Thailand planted a tree in the fall of 2005. A buffet with many variations of the northern Thai cuisine and homegrown vegetables is laid out. Wasan, the drummer, leads his companions as they swing their hips and are swept into a wild dance by the “Drums of Victory”. Demonstrations of ancient and modern dances follow, and the highlight – by which time it has grown dark – is the Candlelight Dance of twenty girls who paint figures in the night with their candles, a symbol of the unity within the diversity.

 

At the end of the evening, a large cake is cut into many pieces – there is enough for everyone. Then it’s time to tidy up. Everyone knows what needs to be done. I take a melon, the top half of which has been ornately carved by Aimee, who wanted to thank everyone that she could learn and live at the School for Life for so many years.

 

 

21st February

 

A phone call from Guillaume Amigues from the World Economic Forum in Geneva. They are interested in the concept of the School for Life and “entrepreneurship education”. In June, a regional meeting will be taking place in Istanbul: this will be a good opportunity to introduce the concept. He goes on to say that 750 million young people are unemployed worldwide, representing a major challenge for both the public and private sectors. I arrange a date to meet with my friend and colleague Günter Faltin (with whom I wrote the book “Wealth from the Bottom” over twenty years ago; back then it was trailblazer in all things entrepreneurial) as he is currently in Chiang Mai: together, we will design a dossier for the World Economic Forum.

 

22nd February

 

Professor Apichai Puntasen, Doyen of Buddhist Economics, and most recently Dean of the Ubon Ratchathanee University in Isan, Thailand’s poorest region, has sent a student. Her name is Thip and she is studying “self-sufficiency economy”, a concept of the King of Thailand. It is the philosophy of independent survival in times of crisis, such as Thailand in 1997, when the currency collapsed overnight. Apichai (the Thai people address one another by their first name) is a board member of the School for Life Foundation and has been a friend and companion of mine for thirty years.

 

Thip is specializing in organic agriculture and has established frog breeding and mushroom cultivation. This is a pilot project in order to gain experience. The mushrooms grow in a mixture of straw and cuttings from banana plants, built into small mounds and covered with plastic sheeting and additional bundles of straw – mushrooms seem to like to keep warm.

 

23rd February

 

The noisest classroom is that of the retired German teacher Angela Grossmass, who has been teaching English pro bono for the last two months. I’m not sure if “teaching” is the right word – more like a direct transfusion of English, through extreme drama, music and rhythm, into the flesh and blood. The children participate with full committment, and by the end they have exerted so much energy – both mental and physical – that they could fall into a deep sleep. And some do.

 

Today, the lesson is about the human body parts. The second-graders launch themselves into a choreography which would most aptly be dubbed “out of breath”. They jump up and down, row with their arms, and their legs swing rhythmically up and down so high that they look as if they are rehearsing for a performance in the Moulin Rouge. Simultaneously, the names of the body parts from head to toe are being sung, and this mixture of loud singing, hopping around, laughter and guesses as what this or that body part is actually called is the best English lesson I have ever seen. It reminds me a little of my French lessons in 1948 in the former robber baron’s castle in Hohenfels, in the lonely hinterlands of western Lake Constance. When Miss Köppen wanted to explain the difference between “under” and “on”, she crawled under the table or climbed on top of it, and we got a raisin if we could supply the right answer.

 

Angela Grossmass is a decidedly favorable contrast to one of my English teachers, who regularly turned up unprepared, got us to open up the English book on a certain page and read a few paragraphs before telling us to close the books and do a dictation. Week after week, a sure-fire remedy against learning English.

 

24th February

 

Kru Tomsri has transformed her little wooden house into a zoo with hamsters and guinea pigs, as well as planting a vegetable garden which is growing by the day. She invites everyone to help themselves to salad and vegetables. The children love the zoo, and often drop by to look at the animals.

 

Next door lives Siriporn, the head teacher, who is busy extending her garden. Seedlings are being replanted, and beans curl their way up the trunks of teak trees. The children help both Tomsri and Siriporn to dig up the dry earth, mix it with organic fertilizer, water and cover the beds with straw and watch the plants grow.

 

Gradually, all of the unused areas of the campus (40 Rai = 6.5 hectares) are being transformed into vegetable fields and fruit plantations. “Self-sufficiency economy”, the philosophy of the King and pioneer of organic agriculture, reminds me of Julius Nyerere’s concept, the big statesman and visionary in Tanzania the 1960s: he called it “self-reliance”, confidence in ones own power. He wanted to implement it in the Ujamaa villages and schools in Commu­nity Development projects, but his bureaucrats countered him with tough resistance and outlived him.

 

25th February

 

Thirty girls and boys from an international school in Bangladesh arrive. They help to renovate buildings. They bring paint and paintbrushes, and the School for Life children once again experience how many nationalities meet to form such a school.

 

The international school from Bangladesh isn’t the only one which has found its way to the School for Life. The international schools from Stavanger in Norway and Düsseldorf in Germany come every year – as long as the Yellow Shirts aren’t occupying the airport, or the Red Shirts taking control of the center of Bangkok, or floods submerging half of the country. Here in the Royal Forest on the hills of Doi Saket, we are far away from such occurrences, and no one must fear for their safety.

 

Every time when a group of students leaves after two or three weeks – the Bangladeshis are an exception to the rule with their two-day stay this time – tears flow on both sides. But the connections that have been made can always be maintained via social networks.

 

 

 

 

27th February

 

Lutz Buschhüter, a graduate of social work who is married here and has lived in Chiang Mai for more than a decade, is coming here to meet up with two young Germans and their Turkish supervisor Onursal. The two boys are in the final phase of a two-and-a-half year program run by the Youth Fund “Par-ce-val” in Berlin and Brandenburg. This is a project that does rehabilitation work with young people who are ‘at risk’, if you will, of delinquency.

 

I met Haci Bayram, the manager of Par-ce-val, in Berlin to prepare the three-month stay in the School for Life. Bayram’s ideas of sending young people to a completely different social and cultural setting to gain experiences there was not new for me. The High Seas High School, which sails for months over the world’s oceans with students from the 10th and 11th grades is a clear example of challenging young people rather than over-domesticating them. We had volunteers in the School for Life whose stay with us was a turning point: one high school student, for example, had told his mother as he departed that he wanted nothing more to do with her,  but realized during his stay how much she meant to him and went on to develop a new, loving relationship with her when he returned; or the 16-year-old who had drifted into the dropout scene of her city, played truant from school and couldn’t see any point to her life, but then went on after her stay here to give up smoking, drinking and drugs, and went back to school to concentrate on her final exams. Her story was filmed for the German TV: “Polly on the Rocks”.

 

Before they leave, the two youths and Onursal talk to me about what went well over the three months, what we could do better for the next visit from Par-ce-val participants, and why they felt almost too good. The core of Par-ce-val’s rehabiliation program is about bringing strictness and structure to the lives of the young people. One of the two young people filmed a very moving video-portrait of Namson, whose mother was sentenced to 24 years’ imprisonment – 16 more years to go – in Chiang Mai.

 

28th February

 

The abbot of the temple of Lamphun, has been a friend of the School for Life for many years. When people come to him and want to make a sacrifice for one reason or another, he encourages them to give 5000 Baht (€125) to fund lunch at the School for Life. The donors can buy everything in advance, as directed by the abbot, cook it at home, and then bring it to the school to eat with the children. The abbot’s soup is famous amongst the children, and tastes delicious. The abbot and the visitors he brings never fail to be amazed at how much the children can eat.

 

Today he’s celebrating his 60th birthday with us. He has brought his monks and fifty relatives and friends along with him. Everyone collects in the canteen, an open-plan, covered room, for the feast. It is late morning – monks are not permitted to eat after midday.

 

29th February

 

In the large room of the farmhouse, big sheets of paper lie on the floor surrounded by lots of smaller ones. The big pieces of paper have the names of the seven Centers of Excellence ‘under the trees’ written on them (unlike the Hanseatic – formerly Beluga – School for Life in the South of Thailand, the School for Life in Chiang Mai doesn’t have buildings for them), and on the colorful smaller labels are written ideas for projects, mini-enterprises and other activities that are assigned to the centers. The school and family teachers (mentors) have gathered in order to plan the next semester, which will last from May to September.

 

Project ideas for the Center for Organic Farming, for example, include fish farming, frog farming, mushroom growing, composting, herbal gardening, animal husbandry and planting fruits and vegetables.

 

For the Center for Culture Sensitive Tourism, a restaurant management team and projects ideas by the names of “being a little guide”, “where do I come from?”, “soul trekking”, or “the forest as a supermarket” have been compiled.

 

Under the tree of the Center for Nutrition & Health, courses in baking, Thai food, international food, and cooking with guests are all on the menu.

 

The piece of paper representing the Center for Cultural Heritage & Development is surrounded by a multitude of colored labels: Thai & contemporary dance, Thai music, world music, classical European music, jazz dance, local wisdom, ethnic fashion, painting, fresh flower fashion, teaching Buddhism, teaching Christianity, comparative understanding of world religions, performance program develop­ment and teaching the culture of indigenous people.

 

The Center for Body and Soul has also generated plenty of ideas: Yoga & Thai massage, football for girls, football for boys, swimming, martial arts for girls, Thai boxing, basket ball, morning exercise and meditation.

 

Children’s World Radio, an introduction to soft- & hardware, cinema club, children’s journal and white board (a large-screen digital window to the world of the internet) belong to the Center for International Communication, while the Center for Technology, Crafts & Ecology has been assigned maintenance, keeping the campus clean and a bicycle repair shop.

 

Since not everything can be assigned to one Center, another sheet of paper with “Other Essential Activities” written on it lies in the middle, surrounded by ideas for a children’s investment bank, a community shop, mediation, morning ceremony, family day, children’s parliament, guardian angels, night guardians and holiday activities.

 

At around 6pm it is slowly getting dark. The teachers are still deep in discussion. The first teams are being formed. Not all of the labels will turn into projects or Mini-Enterprises – we will set priorities. One upon which everyone agrees is organic farming and animal husbandry. The road towards a self-sufficiency economy is beset with many obstacles, but the Situational Approach upon which the Schools for Life are founded favors learning in challenging, real-life environments. You don’t have to look far to find these on the campus – it’s more a case of stumbling over them.

 

1st March

 

Like on every school day, the temple bell is struck at 6am by a child with a metal rod. It begins with individual taps, and is followed by a quick staccato which then flows back into individual chimes. Then everyone gathers together in front of the auditorium, where the Thai flag is raised and the national anthem sung. The relatively tall aluminum mast is fitted with a pulley at the top, through which the rope runs. The flag is still hanging at the bottom. Today, two six-year-olds will raise the flag. The Head Pupil, Master of Ceremony, begins with a song to which everyone sings along. Depending on how high or low the caller begins, the children always find a pitch that feels comfortable to them. Darius Milhaud would have delighted in the ensuing polyphonic chant that is somehow taken for granted here.

 

The girl and boy try to raise the flag slowly enough so that it doesn’t reach the top of the pole until the end of national anthem. The pulley is squeaking, and several dogs start to bicker and chase a few children back and forth, and when the hymn is over there are still several meters of flag pole left to go, so the children then hoist the flag up as quickly as if they were launching a rocket.

 

And now it is time for an alternating recitation, like in the monks’ ceremonies. Then it is quiet again. The children are meditating, and the dogs have quietened down and are lying about in the shade. The School for Life song is often sung, beginning with the words “School for Life our home, our school …” and ending “I have brothers, sisters and friends”.

 

The children are still standing in six or seven rows, the younger ones on the left and older on the right, with their gaze fixed on the flag. But now the children in the first row turn to those in the second row and both greet each other with a Wai and a “Sawasdee”. The children in the second and third rows then greet each other in the same way, and then the third and fourth rows. The greeting is passed on in such a manner until everyone has been greeted. Finally, the children greet the teachers, volunteers and often the guests too.

 

After that, they form large circles and a meditative dance begins with very slow movements that point up to the heavens or down towards the earth. It is in this way that the strict, ceremonial atmosphere is dissolved into a soft, peaceful sense of togetherness.

 

I used not to think much of rituals, but nowadays I have a different opinion of them. They offer structure in lives which have been overshadowed by biographical catastrophes. The children at the School for Life love rituals.

 

2nd March

 

The School for Life is more than a school. The academic core, the official part so to speak, consists of a nationally recognized social welfare school. It has a ‘School Board’ as well as coming under the umbrella of the overall ‘Board of the School for Life Foundation’ . On both committees, Thai people form the majority.

 

Today, the School Board is meeting. Its members include, among others, the representative of the highest education authority for private schools, the mayor of a community association, the representative of the Royal Forest project, a lawyer from the nearby village of Pongkum, the head teacher and her deputy as well as a family teacher representing the absent or non-existent parents of the children.

 

Two issues shape the debate this morning. First of all, how can bridges be built between the national curriculum and the projects and mini-enterprises? How can the conventional subjects be looted in order to shift some of their content into the new, interdisciplinary ‘clean slates’ of the Centers of Excellence? The seven sheets of paper with the names of the Centers and the labels with the project ideas lie on the conference table in the school library. With the school inspectors, we discuss questions such as how at least half of 120 teaching hours of mathematics can be transferred to other activities and nonetheless still be recognized and evaluated. The school inspectors comment that such a dynamic model, emphasizing the application of knowledge in real situations, has unfortunately not yet arrived in Thai schools. The children are kept inside the classroom and exposed to long speeches by their teachers, memorizing things which are then forgotten again.

 

Second on the agenda: the government has increased the minimum wage for teachers from 8000 to 15000 THB (200/375 €). In the primary school, one teacher is subsidized per 25 children, and in the junior high school, one teacher to 20 children. At this rate, the School for Life will only receive a grant for five teachers. But we have 12 teachers, because according to the School Act, each class must have one teacher. The nursery has three classes for the three-, four- and five-year olds and operates according to the Ministry of Education’s expectations for same-aged classes (unlike us). The elementary school with grades one to six, and the junior high school with grades seven to nine also all need one teacher per class. If we only hired five teachers, we would lose our license. So in the future there will be five funded teachers and seven unfunded teachers. Previously, all twelve teachers received state grants. For us, this means more toing and froing in terms of educational policy.

 

5th March

 

The arrival of Lena Grüber. Lena, who is 26, studied Art in Public Spaces at Berlin-Weissensee. She also helps in the editorial team of “Betrifft Kinder” (Re: Children) and “The Net Publisher”. Her mother, Eva Grüber, became self-employed after the reunification of Germany and began to publish journals and books which do away with educational fussing around, instead seeing children as explorers, experimenters and constructors of their own lives. No educational “jargon” escapes the eagle-eye of the editor.

 

The magazine “Re: Children” is a fan of the School for Life, as is Lena with her big analog camera. She says that shooting analog photos demands more thought and a more accurate sense of waiting for the right moment. The problem with documentary filmmaking and photography, though, is that situations pass by so quickly and can never be repeated; you therefore have to somehow imagine what might happen, and Lena will try to catch some of those moments over the next three days.

 

In the afternoon, the teachers meet again. They form groups on three different subjects. Firstly: Mind Mapping in connection with the fish farming project. When such projects go off at a tangent, it doesn’t mean anyone has got lost – it’s just another chance to learn. The children themselves develop maps of the situations which interest them the most. Since the fish farming project doesn’t take eight hours a day, there’s plenty of opportunity for that.

 

Questions thus emerge which demand clarification and experimental research. Can fish sleep? Why don’t they sink? Don’t they need air? Fish float, but stones and wood sink – why? Why does a stone sink more slowly in oil than in water? Why can birds and butterflies fly? Do they crash sometimes? Airplanes fly too – how do they do that? Why do they crash sometimes, why don’t they float down to the ground if they have wings? How do rockets fly? And when fish get hungry, what do they eat? How do they have babies? Do they lay eggs like birds? Don’t the eggs swim off? Why don’t people lay eggs? What is an egg exactly? If we don’t eat the fish, but want to sell them, where could we sell them and how much for? Why only 20 baht for a fish and not 200? You can get money so easily when you put a card into a machine and push buttons … and so on.

 

Secondly: the planning of an excursion of a few days with the children and guests to the nearby villages the children are from. The project is called “Where do I come from?”. This way, the guests will also get to know the everyday culture of the Thai people and ethnic minorities beyond the well-trodden tourist paths, and make new friends.

 

Thirdly: local wisdom. What do the elders know, and what have the young people forgotten? Who can the children ask, and how can they document their findings? The idea comes from Eliot Wigginton (USA), who in 1966 as a young teacher began collecting the stories of old people with his class. This was in the Appalachians, and was the consequence of Wigginton’s realization that the methods he had learned at university were practically useless with his students. The “Foxfire Book”, with its multiple volumes, was the result of their research, and sold millions of copies. Many many readers wanted to know how to build a cabin or a chimney out of rocks, how to construct a rabbit trap or how to extract the bristles from a slaughtered pig, what a homemade banjo looks like or how a smoking oven can be built.

 

The teachers at the School for Life want to go out with the children into the surrounding areas, find the wise old people, and find out first of all how to build a bamboo hut covered in dry leaves; they don’t just want to collect the knowledge, but they want to build a life-size version with the children, not just a miniature model.

 

6th March

 

The Step Foundation in Freiburg (Germany) has funded sports facilities, including a large football field and a basketball court. At 5pm, it’s time for girls’ football – on the basketball court, because the grass-covered football field is still hazy with the heat of the day, and the distances really are very far to run. Two little goals stand underneath the basketball nets, and the girls are dribbling, shooting, shouting and laughing, with little breaks here and there when the ball – which is not contained by any fence – disappears into the distance and has to be retrieved. The teacher, Dim, whose stature and shooting power is somewhat reminiscent of the legendary ‘Bomber Müller’ from FC Bayern, played in the first ever women’s football team in Chiang Mai seven years ago. Her job is funded by the Foundation in Freiburg, so for the first time we have the opportunity to form a real team with the ten- to twelve-year-olds.

 

Martial arts for girls is also on the wish list. Not full contact martial arts, but dance-like forms such as Pencak Silat from Indonesia or Brazilian Capoeira. The aim is to promote the girls’ self-confidence through martial arts which can be transformed into a dance ritual with high levels of physical discipline.

 

7th March

 

An evening trip to the outlying Wang Tarn restaurant with Trirat Petchsingh, son of a diplomat, who grew up in various countries and is an engineer, has founded a Computer School, teaches at an elite school in the vicinity of Bangkok. Trirat, who can speak better English than Thai, and runs a website which offers a critical perspective on Buddhism,was  a journalist for Reuters and “The Nation”,  and is the author of “Thai mangoes”, a book of short stories – Trirat is leaving us. Responsible for “education innovation”, he says he couldn’t get the backing of the teachers. He comes from a very different world. I appreciate his honesty, his commitment to children, his education, his penchant for experimenting and scientific learning, and I observe the relentlessness – reminiscent of that of Michael Kohlhaas – with which he throws himself into conflicts and creates opponents for himself. He says that he was not the right man for the job, and I agree. We amicably agree that he will retire and take care of his daughters and their companies.

 

Trirat’s role is filled by two people. Manoon Kalapat, former director of the Hotel Training Institute of the Beluga (now Hanseatic) School for Life – a friendly, experienced manager of Hotel Management Schools and hotels, who speaks fluent English and began working for the School Life a few months ago months as grounds manager and head of the guest area. He will now be responsible for the implementation and development of the educational concept. The other person is Dr. Chanmongkol Trisri, previously known as Charlniwat – he has changed his name because Chanmongkol means ‘long life’, and this gets more important the more years one numbers. He spent five years as director of the Center for Organic Farming at the Beluga School for Life and was very highly regarded by the guests for his storytelling skills and for guiding them through the jungle. Now Chanmongkol wants to work in the North. His seventeen-year-old son is studying two hours’ drive away, in Chiang Rai, and will be happy to see his father more often.

 

Chanmongkol will become Director for Organic Farming & Animal Husbandry at the School for Life, and be one of those responsible for seeing that we not only move towards our goal of agricultural self-sufficiency, but also raise funds through the cultivation of highly priced products like cantaloupe melons or out-of-season limes. We are also receiving advice from Ex-Senator Mechai, who many years ago organized a successful nationwide Anti-Aids awareness campaign and since then goes by the nickname of “Mr. Condom”.

 

One of Chanmongkol’s showpieces has been the establishment of a pig farm in China that doesn’t smell. That was a great sensation for all involved. Prior to this, there had been violent dispute with the owners of nearby hotels because of the odors – but after Chanmongkol had solved the problem, the hotel owners were so happy that they became shareholders of the pig farm!

 

Chanmongkol has also advised farmers in Israel. He knows how to drive away snakes with mongooses and that you can feed catfish with a dead dog and they’ll gnaw it down to the bone in six hours. He rides, and when he puts on a hat, he looks like the brother of Charles Bronson. We will breed odor-free pigs, and if the pig farmers in Mecklenburg (a pig-breeding area of Germany) want to know how to avoid the protests of local citizens, then Chanmongkol can hold seminars to reveal his secrets if they are willing to pay good money to the School for Life.

 

But now he has a new problem: some time ago, on Trirat’s initiative, the creek at the lower part of the grounds was dug out for twenty meters for the purposes of breeding fish. Many small fish were introduced into mesh baskets of several square meters. Now they have grown, and it appears that the designers of the baskets underestimated the intelligence of the fish – Chanmongkol has seen the fish overcoming the sides of the basket in one elegant leap and swim off to their freedom. Not an insurmountable problem, but one of many in the world of fish farming.

 

8th March

 

Chalee was here. School inspector, evaluator and specialist in teacher training, whose workplaces extend over much of Thailand. He thinks that the School for Life’s concept, or more precisely the connection between the national curriculum and the Centers of Excellence, would be a good idea for every school. Today, Chalee is here to train the new teachers about how to build bridges between the curriculum subjects and the Centers, as well as on how the inescapable “credit points” can be awarded beyond the confines of conventional education. Chalee loves movement, is an entertainer, and hates the classroom – so the seminar will take place outdoors.

 

Basically, it’s like in a good kitchen: you take the elements from the different subjects, mix them up into a project and then treat this fusion not as some unofficial game, but rather as a modern version of a previously antiquated structure of a curriculum. Yes, something like that. The “credit points” are then just the stamp of approval.

 

Although I can imagine learning without “credit points”, and it’s not as if I’m a supporter of this dynamized bureaucracy, I do realize that in this way we can do sensible things without risking the academic recognition of our children’s efforts. Thanks to Chalee.

 

9th March

 

Born in Berlin in 1787, Emma Hart went on to emigrate to America and marry Dr. John Willard, thus becoming Emma Willard. In 1819, she wrote to the House of Representatives in Vermont campaigning for the education of women, sending them a kind of Magna Carta for the higher education of women in America. In the same year, she opened a school for girls, today’s Emma Willard School in upstate New York.

On the 9th of March 2012 at around 9:30am, two minibuses arrive at the gates of the School for Life. Around twenty girls from the Emma Willard School, a gang of spirited fourteen- to fifteen-year-olds, clamber out of the buses. Students from other countries are always received by our children with a big hello. They want to join in with decorating one of the walls of the house with colorful characters, dance and play with the children, and show them that Emma Willard is an important role model. They have brought along her portrait and hold it up high as they gather for a group photo.

 

10th March

 

At the Pattaya Polo Club, Dominique Leutwiler met Harald Link, its owner, and spoke to him about the development of the groom’s training project. Link, initially distracted by telephone calls and all of the things distract the attention of a manager of a large company who runs a polo club as a hobby, was suddenly gripped by this project, unique  in Thailand, realized its value and was thrilled. Now we can move forward together.

Everywhere in the clubhouse there are photos, including ones of the British princes William and Harry, who have played polo here. The demand for grooms who are skilled enough to make a career of it is much greater than our project can meet at this stage, so expansion is called for.

 

Harald Link asked whether we have horses on the farm; no, we don’t. Well then he’ll send us a couple of horses so that the children can get used to them at an early stage. Chanmongkol is already looking forward to converting part of the grounds into a ranch or cooperating with a neighbor.

 

The groom’s training project has its costs. On the way to writing a memorandum of understanding, we will consider how we can return our investments from the customers and define the proportion of overhead costs in favor of the School for Life so that more is covered than just the costs.

 

12th March

 

The vice-governor of the province of Chiang Mai, Pairoj Sangpoowong, wanted to come and visit today, but ended up having to go to the constituent assembly in Bangkok instead. The Board of the School for Life Foundation will meet at the farmhouse. Those present are Chamnang Chanruang, governor of 65 Rotary clubs in northern Thailand and Senior Legal Expert at the Administrative Court of Chiang Mai; Mary Kelly, on behalf of her husband Matthew, who once played with the “Grateful Dead” and now heads the Amicus Foundation, but is sick today; Prof. Apichai Puntasen, director of the Rural & Social Management Institute under Royal Patronage in Bangkok; Siriporn Hanfaifa, the school director; Dominique Leutwiler, the general manager; and myself. Manoon Kalapat and Chanmongkol Trisri are also present as expert witnesses.

 

We discuss the development of schools, the finances, the new management structure and the long-term security of the School for Life. I announce that the School for Life will be ten years old next year, and I will be 75, and that I plan to retire from all operational matters at the end of 2013 and deal only with the more enjoyable affairs of educational innovation. It therefore makes sense to found an Association of Supporters of the School for Life by this time, in order to ensure the existence of the project in the long term – half of the suporters coming from Thailand, the other half from Germany and the rest of the world.

 

13th March

 

It is a day of departure, joy and sadness: graduation day. The graduates of the 9th grade will follow different paths from now on: to Senior High School in nearby Doi Saket, to Chiang Mai Technical College, or to undertake other professional training. Most of them will stay on with us for the next three years, either commuting every day and continuing to live on the campus or, like the grooms in training,  moving into a townhouse where they will continue to be looked after by us.

 

At 9am, everyone gathers in the Seminar building which has by now been brightly painted by our international guests. The graduates have flowers pinned to their lapels. Speeches, dances, laughter – and tears, not only in the children’s eyes. The head boy has to interrupt his speech because his eyes overflow. He speaks of the happy time he has spent here and says that when he has made something of himself, he wants to come back and support the School for Life. I also believe that some of the graduates of the first generations of the School for Life will return as very capable teachers. They will be very welcome, as are all alumni.

 

Now that the event is coming to an end, the graduates of the Junior High School are all solemnly presented with their documents. This is followed by a particularly beautiful custom: the adults tie small white bands around the graduates’ wrists and wish them well. Many hugs and more tears.

The beautiful flower arrangements are carried outside onto the sports field: group photo. The cameras click. Their faces are radiant once more. In the evening there is a BBQ outside the farm house for the celebrated graduates and teachers. A screen is erected, texts roll across it, and the sounds of karaoke are to be heard until late into the night.

 

Then – silence. But no. A dog that apparently sees ghosts every night begins to bark furiously. No other dogs join in. They know that this dog is not quite right in the head.

 

15th March

 

Late on the previous evening, a brief and violent storm swept the leaves from the trees, tore branches down, lifted up one of the rooves and felled a tree. No electricity for fourteen hours. Nobody has to oversee the cleanup next morning – everyone has their job and knows what to do.

The holiday season begins. Many children set off to their villages, others are taken to their villages by the teachers, and some remain on the farm.

 

The school and family teachers gather together and form teams of four: Team A for the nursery, Team B for grades one to three, Team C for grades four to six of the primary school, and team D for grades seven to nine of the junior high School. Each team also manages a family with children. Four, rather than the previous two teachers, take on the role of parenting. Each team is responsible for both curricular and extracurricular life. The teachers want to overcome the formation of subcultures – school on the one side and family on the other. I like this integration. In the world of boarding schools, you find the structure of ‘school’ versus ‘boarding’ with teachers and mentors or the role of teacher and mentor in one. We tried that practice, but it led to the overloading of teachers, giving them less time to prepare for classes.

 

The model of integration of the two areas will be tested next semester, and one of its best features is that we can break up the usual daily routine – lessons in the morning, projects and other activities in the afternoon – in favor of a rhythm which is both more child-friendly and makes more sense: dedicating the cooler parts of the day in the morning and late evening to organic agriculture, and using the rest of the day for school, project and free time to avoid forming a rigid routine.

 

The teachers are very satisfied with the teams they have built. Towards the end of the meeting, the old teachers practise both of the School for Life songs with the new teachers and show them what is meant by “making power”. We form a tight circle, put all our hands in a pile in the center, count to three and then raise our arms with a powerful “School for Life – Yeah!”. We have been doing that for the last nine years.

 

At 5.30pm, the closing party for all the employees begins outdoors in front of the farmhouse. BBQ, dancing and karaoke. The mood is relaxed. Chanmongkol muses with Sampan over how he can purify used water for irrigation purposes. The driver, Tub, tells us that he thinks he needs to be paid a little more because he has to buy all his own food when he’s on the road. The cook is dancing rock ‘n’ roll. A half moon is in the sky. Even at midnight, the hardier among us are still singing. At some point in the night, everything is cleaned up. It is all done as quick as a flash. And then there is peace.

 

No, not entirely. The dog who sees ghosts begins to howl again. No other dog joins in, but a frog does. The stormy rain lured him out of his hole in the ground too early. Now he croaks for attention, but in vain. No other frog replies. The dog who sees ghosts and the lonely frog are an odd couple in the night before the day when I pack my things and set off to the South, to the other School for Life.

Categories
articles

Talk Less, Teach More! Nonverbal Classroom Management (part 2)

TALK LESS. TEACH MORE!
NONVERBAL CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT

Pearl Nitsche

 
You are ALWAYS communicating!

Let’s take a look at what nonverbal communication actually is.

Professor Albert Mehrabian, a pioneer since the 60s in communication research, determined during a communications project for the University of California that there are 3 factors that influence the effect a conversation has. These are:

  • 7% verbal        =      the words which are spoken
  • 38% vocal        =      how these words sound and
  • 55% visual       =      how you look when you say them.

That comes to 7% verbal and 93% nonverbal! Other more conservative studies estimate that the nonverbal part of communication comes to about 82%.

An impressive percentage! In other words, what you say is important but HOW you say it is even more so! And this percentage also makes us aware that we are ALWAYS communicating – whether we are speaking or not!

Very often though we are not aware of the nonverbal signals we are sending.  Sometimes the nonverbal message and the verbal one don’t match up. Then we are surprised, disappointed or angry when our students do not follow our directions or react as we expect them to.
Yes. Actions DO speak louder than words. And you can be very sure that if a verbal and a nonverbal message are in conflict, the student will ALWAYS, ALWAYS, ALWAYS  react to the nonverbal message. This is called being INCONGRUENT.

For example, take a look at this picture:

 
Our goal should be exactly the opposite – we want to be congruent
Just imagine that I am standing before you.

My posture is tense.

My arms are crossed in front of my chest.

I have a grim frown upon my face.

My voice is dripping with sarcasm as I say the following words:

 

“I’m really glad that you are taking part in this webinar!”

 

Do you believe my words?

 

Probably not.

Now let’s take a look at an example where the teacher is congruent:

 
And now imagine that I am standing in front of you

and my posture is relaxed and open.

My hands are stretched out in front of me.

The palms are facing upward.

I am smiling at you and

I say in a warm and friendly voice,

“I’m glad that you are taking part today.”

 

That was better, wasn’t it?
The first time I was incongruent.

My nonverbal message contradicted my verbal one.

The result: I expressed the exact opposite of what I actually wanted to get across.

The second time I was congruent.

My verbal and my nonverbal messages were in sync with one another.

Therefore I got my point across and you believed my words.

Let’s look at another example:
Imagine that I want my students to write an essay.

We have discussed all the details and I have listed them on the board.

All of the important questions have been answered and I would like them to start writing.

My verbal message:

“Now we will begin. No more questions, please.”

 

Quite clear, isn’t it? Or perhaps it isn’t.

The words are clear.

But whether the pupils follow my instructions is dependent upon whether my words and my nonverbal message correspond. It is, once again, a question of congruency.

How is my posture?

My facial expression?

What does my voice sound like?

Those are decisive factors that will determine whether my directions will be followed or not and how others will react or interpret my intentions.

In these examples there are two kinds of voices that I can choose between:

  • the CREDIBLE VOICE and
  • the INVITING VOICE

Both voices are very useful. What is important is choosing the right voice for the right situation!

The CREDIBLE VOICE is the one I use, for example,

  • when I discipline,
  • when I give instructions
  • when I have a serious conversation with my students where I do not expect them to talk back or
  • when I want to get their attention.

This voice carries the message, “Do what I say. And no contradictions!”

Here’s a picture of the credible voice. (I would like to add that although it can look like this, I usually do this voice with the arms close to the torso and the elbows bent.)

 
My posture and my body movement (or my lack of movement, in this case) determine which voice I produce.

When I speak with a CREDIBLE VOICE, I hold my body straight and still. My feet are parallel to one another with the toes pointing forward. My chin is tilted down slightly. Because my body is still, my head is also still.

The way I hold my head has direct influence on my voice. When my head is still, my voice is monotone and it often goes down at the end of a sentence or statement.

Those who naturally have a credible voice tend to be assertive and get their own way. When they talk, others listen. And then go into action. The disadvantage of this voice lies in the quality as well as the quantity of communication. Although these people often want to communicate, they very often have problems starting and conducting productive conversations.
The second voice is known as the INVITING VOICE.
 
This is the voice I use when I want to converse with my students, when a discussion, suggestions and ideas are welcome. This voice encourages conversation and an exchange of ideas.

Those with an INVITING VOICE tend to move their bodies while speaking. The movement is rhythmical and symmetrical. Their arms are held close to the body and move slightly in the same rhythm. These speakers occasionally show the palms of their hands while speaking. The head and therefore the voice move up and down in rhythm with the body movement. And the voice tends to go up at the end of a statement – as it does at the end of a question. And your pupils will tend to answer – whether you asked a question or not!

People who have an inviting voice are sociable masters of communication. They can talk on almost any topic and bring out the best in those to whom they are speaking. The disadvantage of using this voice is that it is difficult to be assertive. Statements made with an inviting voice are regularly challenged and discussed. The discussions can be lengthy – and in the end nothing actually happens!
You will prefer one voice or the other. This is the voice that will feel natural to you. And – as a teacher – it is very likely that the voice you prefer is the auditive one. It is good when you recognize your own preference. And at the same time, it is ESSENTIAL that you choose the right voice for the right situation!
Upon hearing this, some teachers respond with,

“But then I won’t be authentic. I won’t be myself!”

Possibly that is true.

But as a teacher you cannot always allow yourself to be totally authentic. We have a job to do. This job is to lead a class. And if for a moment you take a step back to better observe yourself and your class’ behavior, you will notice that the class is a mirror in which you can observe yourself.

 
That means that when you are lively, your class will be lively.

When you are calm, they are calm too.

If you like to talk, you will have a talkative group.

If you notice that a class behaves differently when you are teaching it than when your colleagues are, you need to ask yourself the question, “Is the class mirroring me?”

As long as the class’s behavior is congruent with your goals in the classroom, this is fine. But, if this is not the case, you need to change your own behavior to match the results you want to achieve. YOU set the tone. The class mirrors you. The first step is creating an environment in the classroom where you can achieve your goals. Once you have created this environment and the class is on task, you can then afford to be yourself.

Let me give you a few examples:
I personally have a quite lively personality and this is often reflected in my teaching. Under normal circumstances, this could be called my “authentic behavior”. Most of the time I can be myself. But there are certain situations where being myself is not beneficial.

For example, the most boring times of the school year for me are the days on which the students have a test. They are all sitting there, as they should be, working diligently and silently on their tests. And I am bored. There is no action! No interaction! But of course I do not allow myself to act “authentically” in this situation because the result of my behavior would be bad grades for the students.

Or I assign an essay that the students should write during the lesson. They are all quiet and busy writing. And suddenly I think of something that I absolutely need to tell the class IMMEDIATELY. Or I begin to converse quietly with one pupil. And what happens? Within second the entire class is talking with me or with each other. And then I have to quiet them down again so that they can complete their work.

And whose fault was it that the class wasn’t quiet? It is not the pupils’ fault but mine! Because I did not act the way I wanted my pupils to act – and they mirrored my behavior.

We need to be aware of our posture and the voice it produces in order to better understand the reactions our own behavior is calling forth in our students. To help you in this task, my son, who is also a teacher trainer, and I made this quite humorous film clip which you can find on You Tube with the search criterion “Pearl Nitsche” or simply by clicking this link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_VbNOhd3xhE Watch it, show it to your colleagues and practice together – until we meet the next time when we’ll be talking about the use of anchors in the classroom.

Categories
articles

Talk Less, Teach More! Nonverbal Classroom Management (part 1)

TALK LESS. TEACH MORE!
NONVERBAL CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT

Pearl Nitsche

The nonverbal classroom management techniques that I will introduce to you in this series of articles are solutions that I have either used successfully while teaching 10- to 14- year-olds as well as 14- to 19-year-olds at two different inner city schools in Vienna, Austria or they are techniques introduced to me by teachers of all school levels and for all subjects – from kindergarten teachers to university lecturers and adult education trainers – who have attended my teacher training seminars throughout the world.

I have held these seminars in 22 different countries on 4 continents and I am asked the same questions in Vienna as in Buenos Aires, in Moscow, in New York and also during the past months where I have been assisting teachers here in Thailand in a local high school. The challenges we are facing are universal and nonverbal classroom management offers us solutions.

THE GOAL: Talk less. Teach more!

We talk and talk and talk in the classroom … and very often we are exhausted by the end of the day and frustrated by the feeling that our students aren’t listening or aren’t taking our verbal instructions seriously. It has been proven that over 82% of a teacher’s communication with her students is NONVERBAL. So why should we waste our breath on getting kids to do what they’re supposed to do? Let’s save our voices for content and use nonverbals to effectively manage the classroom.

Once you start using these techniques you will discover that it is not necessary to raise your voice in the classroom. I know it sounds incredible – but it’s true.

A very good friend of mine, Renée, is an inspiring teacher. She successfully and joyfully taught elementary school for 16 years. Then she got a new first-grade class, which she would be teaching –as it is usual in Austria – for the next 4 years. Within a few weeks she realized that she could not get this class under control. She had tried all the techniques that had worked in the past – with no success. She had a talk with the director of her school and told her that she was considering giving up the teaching profession. The children were quite intelligent, but their behavior was wild, loud and they appeared to be “untameable”. And then she came to the seminar “Nonverbal Classroom Management.” Suddenly she saw a light at the end of the tunnel!

Renée returned to school with her head full of plans, nonverbal techniques, and anchors, which we will talk about in more detail in Part 3 of our series. She used these techniques –systematically- and within a short period of time she had “tamed her little lions.” Renée’s techniques became automatic for her, and the children also responded automatically. By the end of 4th grade, when they moved on to a new school, they were the living example of the “perfect class”. The children had learned a lot. School was a pleasant experience for them. And Renée was a happy teacher!

In the meantime Renée has finished the four year cycle with that class and with the next one too. Last year, at the end of school picnic, one of the mothers came up to Renée and said, “I need to ask you something. My son told me that in the four years that he was in your class, you never raised your voice a single time? How do you do it?”

So Renée told her some of her nonverbal “secrets”. And the mother was truly impressed.

Yes, it’s possible. And the best part is: It’s easy!

Basically what I am telling you is simply common sense. We all know these things. Many of the techniques I will mention here, you are already doing. Others you will have observed in your colleagues or you might have seen them used by your teachers while you were a student yourself at school.

We know it, but it is on an unconscious level. We simply need to become aware of the resources, the tips, tools and the techniques we already know, have used or  which we have experienced. And then we need to be brave enough to stop talking and try DOING something different!

Several years ago I visited my brother and his family in America at Christmas time. One evening my brother said, “Guess who I ran into on the street yesterday? You’re old math teacher!” I was quite surprised at this and my brother continued, “He asked how you were doing in Austria and then he asked me if you had already learned in which direction one should face when sitting on a chair?”

I had to laugh out loud! When I was in school I was always chatting with someone during the lesson – either behind me, or to my right, to my left – or occasionally on the other side of the room. The one direction I wasn’t looking in was straight ahead at the teacher.

My brother went on, “He said that every time he says the words ‘Turn around’, he thinks of you!”

We laughed a lot about this. And then at the end of the Christmas holidays I returned to Vienna. On the first day of school, I couldn’t believe my ears when I heard myself saying to a student, “Dreh’ dich um!” (which means “Turn around” in German). I thought to myself, “How many hundreds of years have teachers in America and other English speaking countries been saying, “Turn around!”, teachers in Austria and Germany say “Dreh’ dich um!”, and from my travels I know that teachers in Buenos Aires say the same thing in Spanish, teachers in Finland say it in Finnish and teachers in Siberia say the same thing in Russian! And I am certain that Thai teachers say it in Thai.

And what good has it done us?

None whatsoever – otherwise we wouldn’t still be saying it!

If I want something to change, then I have to do something differently than the way I have always done it.

It’s the same as if I wake up in the morning and think, “I would love to have scrambled eggs for breakfast!” I go to the kitchen, take two eggs out of the refrigerator and break them into a frying pan. I fry them and then I suddenly realize that I have fried eggs instead of scrambled eggs!

I think to myself, “What? Fried eggs?!? That’s not what I wanted. I wanted scrambled eggs. Oh, well. Fried eggs are also good so I’ll eat them – and MAYBE … if I’m lucky … tomorrow it will be better.”

And the next day I do the same thing all over again and once again I’m disappointed because I have fried eggs instead of scrambled eggs.

And it will ALWAYS be this way. Until I do something differently.

With the eggs, it’s stirring them with a fork.

And in the classroom I need to find nonverbal solutions – because actions really do speak louder than words!

In this series I will include a lot of tips, techniques and tools for you to choose from Yes, contrary to what many of us learned during our studies, there ARE tried and true recipes for managing a classroom. We do not need to rediscover the wheel each and every time a discipline or classroom problem comes up. We can use what others who have gone before us have learned. We need to be realistic though. There is no one single cure-all, no magic bullet that can be used in each and every case. Different situations, different classes and different age groups require a variety of techniques as well as the flexibility to adapt these tools to your classroom needs. We need to remain flexible. To pick and choose.

Therefore I would like to invite you to a nonverbal management techniques “buffet”. Help yourself! Fill up your plate generously with all of the delicacies on the buffet. Take the one you need and fancy at the moment. Enjoy them and use them to improve the atmosphere in your classroom.

But –please! – let’s keep the leftovers! Don’t throw away what you don’t need today. Feel free to pack it up and put it in the freezer for another day, another class and another challenge!

Bon Appetit, my teacher friends! Enjoy your meal!

In the meantime, take a look at this film clip in You Tube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1oEsa2UR3cM  (you can also find it be typing in “Pearl Nitsche” as your search criterion). My son, Derrick, who is also a teacher trainer, and I made this video as an introduction to nonverbal classroom management. It sums up what we have been looking at here and it is also an excellent introduction for your colleagues to the topic of Nonverbal Classroom Management. Enjoy!

The next installment in this series is all about the credible and the inviting voice and posture. Talk to you soon!

Talk Less, Teach More! Part 2

Categories
articles

Expanding the 5E Model

Sometimes a current model must be amended to maintain its value after new information,
insights, and knowledge have been gathered. Such is now the case with the
highly successful 5E learning cycle and instructional model (Bybee 1997). Research
on how people learn and the incorporation of that research into lesson plans and
curriculum development demands that the 5E model be expanded to a 7E model.

The 5E learning cycle model requires instruction to
include the following discrete elements: engage, explore,
explain, elaborate, and evaluate. The proposed 7E model
expands the engage element into two components—elicit
and engage. Similarly, the 7E model expands the two
stages of elaborate and evaluate into three components—
elaborate, evaluate, and extend. The transition from the 5E
model to the 7E model is illustrated in Figure 1.
These changes are not suggested to add complexity,
but rather to ensure instructors do not omit crucial elements
for learning from their lessons while under the
incorrect assumption they are meeting the requirements
of the learning cycle.

Eliciting prior understandings
Current research in cognitive science has shown that eliciting
prior understandings is a necessary component of
the learning process. Research also has shown that expert
learners are much more adept at the transfer of learning
than novices and that practice in the transfer of learning
is required in good instruction (Bransford, Brown, and
Cocking 2000).

The engage component in the 5E model is intended to
capture students’ attention, get students thinking about the
subject matter, raise questions in students’ minds, stimulate
thinking, and access prior knowledge. For example,
teachers may engage students by creating surprise or doubt
through a demonstration that shows a piece of steel sinking
and a steel toy boat floating. Similarly, a teacher may
place an ice cube into a glass of water and have the class
observe it float while the same ice cube placed in a second
glass of liquid sinks. The corresponding conversation with
the students may access their prior learning. The students
should have the opportunity to ask and attempt to answer,
“Why is it that the toy boat does not sink?”

The engage component includes both accessing prior
knowledge and generating enthusiasm for the subject
matter. Teachers may excite students, get them interested
and ready to learn, and believe they are fulfilling
the engage phase of the learning cycle, while ignoring
the need to find out what prior knowledge students
bring to the topic. The importance of eliciting prior understandings
in ascertaining what students know prior to
a lesson is imperative. Recognizing that students construct
knowledge from existing knowledge, teachers
need to find out what existing knowledge their students
possess. Failure to do so may result in students developing
concepts very different from the ones the teacher
intends (Bransford, Brown, and Cocking 2000).

A straightforward means by which teachers may elicit
prior understandings is by framing a “what do you think”
question at the outset of the lesson as is done consistently

in some current curricula. For example, a common physics
lesson on seat belts might begin with a question about
designing seat belts for a racecar traveling at a high rate of
speed (Figure 2, p. 58). “How would they be different
from ones available on passenger cars?” Students responding
to this question communicate what they know about
seat belts and inform themselves, their classmates, and the
teacher about their prior conceptions and understandings.
There is no need to arrive at consensus or closure at this
point. Students do not assume the teacher will tell them
the “right” answer. The “what do you think” question is
intended to begin the conversation.

The proposed expansion of the 5E model does not
exchange the engage component for the elicit component;
the engage component is still a necessary element in good
instruction. The goal is to continue to excite and interest
students in whatever ways possible and to identify prior
conceptions. Therefore the elicit component should stand
alone as a reminder of its importance in learning and
constructing meaning.

Explore and explain
The explore phase of the learning cycle provides an opportunity
for students to observe, record data, isolate
variables, design and plan experiments, create graphs,
interpret results, develop hypotheses, and organize their
findings. Teachers may frame questions, suggest approaches,
provide feedback, and assess understandings.
An excellent example of teaching a lesson on the metabolic
rate of water fleas (Lawson 2001) illustrates the

Figure 1

effectiveness of the learning cycle with
varying amounts of teacher and learner
ownership and control (Gil 2002).
Students are introduced to models,
laws, and theories during the explain
phase of the learning cycle. Students
summarize results in terms of these new
theories and models. The teacher guides
students toward coherent and consistent
generalizations, helps students with distinct
scientific vocabulary, and provides
questions that help students use this vocabulary
to explain the results of their
explorations. The distinction between
the explore and explain components ensures
that concepts precede terminology.

Applying knowledge
The elaborate phase of the learning cycle
provides an opportunity for students to
apply their knowledge to new domains,
which may include raising new questions
and hypotheses to explore. This phase
may also include related numerical problems
for students to solve. When students
explore the heating curve of water and
the related heats of fusion and vaporization,
they can then perform a similar experiment
with another liquid or, using
data from a reference table, compare and
contrast materials with respect to freezing
and boiling points. A further elaboration
may ask students to consider the
specific heats of metals in comparison to
water and to explain why pizza from the
oven remains hot but aluminum foil beneath
the pizza cools so rapidly.
The elaboration phase ties directly to
the psychological construct called
“transfer of learning” (Thorndike 1923).
Schools are created and supported with
the expectation that more general uses
of knowledge will be found outside of
school and beyond the school years
(Hilgard and Bower 1975). Transfer of
learning can range from transfer of one
concept to another (e.g., Newton’s law
of gravitation and Coulomb’s law of
electrostatics); one school subject to another
(e.g., math skills applied in scientific
investigations); one year to another
(e.g., significant figures, graphing,
chemistry concepts in physics); and
school to nonschool activities (e.g., using
a graph to calculate whether it is cost

Figure 2

effective to join a video club or pay a higher rate on
rentals) (Bransford, Brown, and Cocking 2000).
Too often, the elaboration phase has come to mean an
elaboration of the specific concepts. Teachers may provide
the specific heat of a second substance and have students
perform identical calculations. This practice in transfer of
learning seems limited to near transfer as opposed to far or
distant transfer (Mayer 1979). Even though teachers expect
wonderful results when they limit themselves to near
transfer with large similarities between the original task
and the transfer task, they know students often find elaborations
difficult. And as difficult as near transfer is for
students, the distant transfer is usually a much harder road
to traverse. Students who are quite able to discuss phase
changes of substances and their related freezing points,
melting points, and heats of fusion and vaporization may
find it exceedingly difficult to transfer the concept of
phase change as a means of explaining traffic congestion.

Practicing the transfer of learning
The addition of the extend phase to the elaborate phase is
intended to explicitly remind teachers of the importance for
students to practice the transfer of learning. Teachers need
to make sure that knowledge is applied in a new context
and is not limited to simple elaboration. For instance, in
another common activity students may be required to invent
a sport that can be played on the moon. An activity on
friction informs students that friction increases with weight.
Because objects weigh less on the moon, frictional forces are
expected to be less on the moon. That elaboration is useful.
Students must go one step further and extend this friction
concept to the unique sports and corresponding play they
are developing for the moon environment.

The evaluate phase of the learning cycle continues to include
both formative and summative evaluations of student learning.
If teachers truly value the learning cycle and experiments
that students conduct in the classroom, then teachers should be
sure to include aspects of these investigations on tests. Tests
should include questions from the lab and should ask students
questions about the laboratory activities. Students should be
asked to interpret data from a lab similar to the one they
completed. Students should also be asked to design experiments
as part of their assessment (Colburn and Clough 1997).
Formative evaluation should not be limited to a particular
phase of the cycle. The cycle should not be linear.
Formative evaluation must take place during all interactions
with students. The elicit phase is a formative evaluation.
The explore phase and explain phase must always
be accompanied by techniques whereby the teacher
checks for student understanding.
Replacing elaborate and evaluate with elaborate, extend,
and evaluate as shown in Figure 1, p. 57, is a way to
emphasize that the transfer of learning, as required in
the extend phase, may also be used as part of the evaluation
phase in the learning cycle.
Enhancing the instructional model
Adopting a 7E model ensures that eliciting prior understandings
and opportunities for transfer of learning are
not omitted. With a 7E model, teachers will engage and
elicit and students will elaborate and extend. This is not
the first enhancement of instructional models, nor will it
be the last. Readers should not reject the enhancement
because they are used to the traditional 5E model, or
worse yet, because they hold the 5E model sacred. The
5E model is itself an enhancement of the three-phrase
learning cycle that included exploration, invention, and
discovery (Karplus and Thier 1967.) In the 5E model,
these phases were initially referred to as explore, explain,
and expand. In another learning cycle, they are referred
to as exploration, term introduction, and concept application
(Lawson 1995).
The 5E learning cycle has been shown to be an
extremely effective approach to learning (Lawson
1995; Guzzetti et al. 1993). The goal of the 7E learning
model is to emphasize the increasing importance of
eliciting prior understandings and the extending, or
transfer, of concepts. With this new model, teachers
should no longer overlook these essential requirements
for student learning.

Arthur Eisenkraft is a project director of Active Physics
and a past president of NSTA, 60 Stormytown Road,
Ossining, NY 10562; e-mail: eisenkraft@att.net.

References
Bransford, J.D., A.L. Brown, and R.R. Cocking, eds. 2000. How
People Learn. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
Bybee, R.W. 1997. Achieving Scientific Literacy. Portsmouth, N.H.:
Heinemann.
Colburn, A., and M.P. Clough. 1997. Implementing the learning
cycle. The Science Teacher 64(5): 30–33.
Gil, O. 2002. Implications of inquiry curriculum for teaching. Paper
presented at National Science Teachers Association Convention,
5–7 December, in Alburquerque, N.M.
Guzzetti B., T.E. Taylor, G.V. Glass, and W.S. Gammas. 1993.
Promoting conceptual change in science: A comparative metaanalysis
of instructional interventions from reading education
and science education. Reading Research Quarterly 28:117–159.
Hilgard, E.R., and G.H. Bower. 1975. Theories of Learning.
Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
Karplus, R., and H.D. Thier. 1967. A New Look at Elementary
School Science. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Lawson, A.E. 1995. Science Teaching and the Development of Thinking.
Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth.
Lawson, A.E. 2001. Using the learning cycle to teach biology concepts and
reasoning patterns. Journal of Biological Education 35(4): 165–169.
Mayer, R.E. 1979. Can advance organizers influence meaningful
learning? Review of Educational Research 49(2): 371–383.
Thorndike, E.L. 1923. Educational Psychology, Vol. II: The Psychology

Categories
articles Featured Articles

Sandy Hook and the ‘Abandoned Gunman’Sandy Hook กับมือปืนที่ถูกทอดทิ้ง?!

Sandy Hook and the ‘Abandoned Gunman’ … by Kru Dhon

After shooting his mother at home, Adam Lanza, 20, passed through the gate of the Sandy Hook Elementary School, in Newtown, Conn., killed 20 Grade 1 students and six teachers, including the Principal, and before taking his own life.  Who is he?

According to news reports, Adam Lanza was a top-of-the-class student in middle school.  He might have Asperger’s Syndrome, a form of autism, which affects social skills.  His school counselor recommended a psychologist.  His mother, who took care of his homeschooling, was in the process of choosing a college for him, while trying to get him serious mental care.

As a teacher, I have been focusing on understanding who Adam Lanza was.  The massacre was not the result of just his argument with Sandy Hook teachers the day before.  The process had started many years earlier. This included his physical and mental state, as well as his family situation.  Adam’s parents were divorced when he was 14, the early phase of a teenager.  He had lived with, and was homeschooled by, his mother, who was reportedly anxious about obtaining guns to protect her property in the time of economic instability.  Nothing was said about his homeschooling activities, except that he was always in his room playing computer games.  Is this good for student with special needs, especially with poor social skills?

After the massacre, President Obama came to Newtown to meet with the survivors and the families of the victims.  He vowed to “take a meaningful action” to prevent another such tragedy.  As we can see, debates for and against gun control have been following in the ensuing weeks.  Questions have also been raised about healing the survivors.  Nothing much has been said in the public forum about how the education system could help students like Adam Lanza and prevent such tragedies.

Luckily, Thailand has not experienced this kind of outrageous mass killing.  As we are entering a new phase of development with the ASEAN Community and unanticipated changes coming along with the 21st Century, are our school and education systems ready to support students?  Are schools and families aware that students with Autism, Asperger’s, learning disorders (LDs), or psychological needs (such as low-self esteem, trauma, depression, school refusal, Schizophrenia, etc.) exist, and at what percentages in the school system?  And how are they cared for?  Are these statistics even available in Thailand?

Although some forms of disorders cannot be cured, most students can be trained to live happily with other people and successfully contribute to society.  In many schools, however, these students are called “the last row students”, and teachers do not bother to do anything with them (usually after punishing them violently and making them hate school). Many students who fall into this category are expelled in order to end the trouble for the school.

My mentor, Ajarn Sasithorn Paiteekul, once told me that if we did not take care of these students and properly deal with violence in schools, expelling them will eventually victimize the society, just as in the case of Sandy Hook Elementary School (as well as Columbine High School, Virginia Tech, and others — see links http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0777958.html).

Sandy Hook กับมือปืนที่ถูกทอดทิ้ง?!

นักเรียนประถม 20 คนวัย 6-8 ขวบ และคุณครูอีก 6 คนจากโรงเรียนประถม Sandy Hook ต้องเสียชีวิตโดย Adam Lanza มือปืนวัย 20 ปี  หลังจากได้ยิงแม่ของเขาเองจนเสียชีวิต  เป็นข่าวที่น่าสะเทือนใจมาก  ไม่แพ้ข่าวการเสียชีวิตของคุณครูที่อยู่ทางใต้ของเรา

ข้อมูลที่รวบรวมจากแหล่งข่าวต่างๆ มีเพียงว่า  หนุ่มคนนี้มีสมองที่ปราดเปรื่อง แต่มีอาการบกพร่องทางทักษะสังคม  พูดน้อย  เก็บตัว ซึ่งอาจจะเป็น Asperger’s Syndrome  เขาอยู่กับแม่ที่เพิ่งหย่าขาดจากพ่อไปเมื่อ 6 ปีที่แล้ว … เป็นช่วงที่เขาอายุ 14 ปี  แม่ผู้คลั่งไคล้อาวุธปืนเพื่อ “ป้องกันตนเอง” เป็นเจ้าของปืนถูกกฎหมายทุกกระบอกที่เขาหอบขึ้นรถไปก่อโศกนาฎกรรม
มีการสั่งห้ามเจ้าหน้าที่รัฐทุกคนให้ข่าวอย่างเด็ดขาด  เมื่อสืบสวนจนได้ข้อมูลที่แน่ชัดแล้วจึงจะแถลงข่าวอย่างเป็นทางการ   [ถ้าเป็นเมืองไทย  ป่านนี้คงได้ขุดคุ้ยจาก”แหล่งข่าว” ที่ไม่เปิดเผย (แปลว่าเชื่อถือได้?!) แล้วก็ร่ำลือกันไป]
ปืนรุ่นเดียวกับของมือปืน จาก http://carloz.newsvine.com/

หลังเกิดเหตุไม่กี่ชั่วโมง ประธานาธิบดีโอบามาเดินทางมายัง Newtown เมืองที่เกิดเหตุ   และกล่าวคำปราศรัยยกย่องความกล้าหาญของคุณครูฮีโร่ตัวจริงที่พยายามปกป้องนักเรียนของตนเองทุกวิถีทาง ในจำนวนนี้มี 6 คนเสียชีวิต [เราไม่ได้ยินเสียงอย่างนี้จากผู้นำของไทย แถมยังไม่ตอบสนองต่อข้อเรียกร้องของครูใต้เรื่องมาตรการเยียวยาครูที่บาดเจ็บและเสียชีวิต]

ฟังจากสุ้มเสียงของประธานาธิบดี และดูจากสภาพการณ์แล้ว  เรื่องที่จะดำเนินการต่อไปซึ่งโอบามากล่าวว่า  จะต้องเป็นมาตรการที่ “มีความหมาย”  คงไม่พ้นเรื่องของการควบคุมอาวุธปืน  ซึ่งบังเอิญว่า ปืนที่ใช้คราวนี้เป็นปืนที่ได้มาอย่างถูกกฎหมายทุกกระบอก  เชื่อได้เลยว่า ขณะนี้ นักการเมืองทั้่ง 2 ขั้วของสหรัฐฯ กำลังเตรียมห้ำหั่นเพื่อรักษาคะแนนเสียงของฝั่ง “เอาปืน” กับ “ไม่เอาปืน”

The Voice (USA) แต่งเพลงรำลึกถึงผู้ที่จากไป @ Sandy Hook

ภาพจาก www.inquisitr.com

อีกกระแสหนึ่งก็เรียกร้องให้ใส่ใจกับการดูแลสภาพจิตใจของทุกคนที่เกี่ยวข้อง และสังคมในวงกว้าง  เพราะเหตุการณ์ครั้งนี้รื้อฟื้นความทรงจำจากอดีตเกี่ยวกับการสังหารหมู่หลายครั้งที่ผ่านมา  ทั้งในโรงเรียนมัธยม  มหาวิทยาลัย หรือแม้แต่ในโรงภาพยนต์

แต่ก็ยังคงมีคำถามค้างคาใจว่า  ทำไมหนุ่มผู้ปราดเปรื่องคนนี้จึงก่อโศกนาฎกรรม  ถ้ามองแบบครู ก็ต้องบอกว่าเหตุการณ์นี้ไม่ได้เกิดขึ้นเพียงชั่วข้ามคืนหลังจากที่เขามีปากเสียงกับครูที่โรงเรียนนี้   สาเหตุที่แท้จริงน่าจะก่อตัวสะสมมานานหลายปีทั้งจากปัจจัยจากการเลี้ยงดู (ในครอบครัวที่จบลงด้วยการหย่าร้างในช่วงที่เขาเป็นวัยแรง ซึ่งแน่นอนว่า ไม่ใช่จากแม่เท่านั้น) และปัจจัย “ภาวะภายใน” คือภาวะบกพร่อง เช่น Asperger’s และพัฒนาต่อมาจนมีอาการทางจิตใจอื่นๆ เพิ่มเข้าไปอีก อันเนื่องจากไม่ได้รับการดูแลอย่างเหมาะสม ทั้งจากบ้านและโรงเรียน

นับว่า  โชคดีที่เหตุการณ์อย่างนี้ยังไม่เคยเกิดขึ้นในเมืองไทย  แต่ก็อดถามต่อไม่ได้ตามวาระที่เรากำลังจะก้าวเข้าสู่โลกที่วุ่นวายตึงเครียดยิ่งขึ้นในยุคศตวรรษที่ 21 และประชาคมอาเซียนว่า   ในเมืองไทยมีเด็กที่มีภาวะต้องการความช่วยเหลือ เช่น เป็นออทิสติก  เป็น Asperger’s  มีภาวะทางจิตใจอารมณ์ (เช่น ซึมเศร้า ย้ำคิดย้ำทำ (OCD) จิตเภท (Schizophrenia) และ ฯลฯ)  จำนวนเท่าไหร่  เด็กกลุ่มนี้ได้รับการดูแลอย่างไร  พ่อแม่ ครู และคนใกล้ชิดเห็นความผิดปกติหรือไม่  แล้วจัดการช่วยเหลือพวกเขาอย่างไร  หรือปลงแล้วว่า “เป็นกรรมเวร ช่างมัน … อยู่ห่างๆ ไว้ดีกว่า”  ทั้งที่เราต่างก็รู้อยู่แก่ใจว่า หลายๆ ภาวะแม้จะแก้ไขให้หายขาดไม่ได้  แต่ก็สามารถฝึกเขาให้มีทักษะในการควบคุมตนเองและอยู่ร่วมกับคนอื่นได้

โรงเรียนที่ไม่เข้าใจก็คิดว่า เด็กกลุ่มนี้เป็นเด็กประหลาด ใช้วิธีการลงโทษเฆี่ยนตี (น่าสยองขวัญมากที่รู้ว่า ในปี 2555 การตีนักเรียนจนมือปวมก้นระบมโดยไม่แก้ไขที่ต้นเหตุยังมีอยู่ทั้งในโรงเรียนรัฐและเอกชนของไทย)  ขณะที่หลายโรงเรียนใช้การ “กำจัดจุดอ่อน” ด้วยการไม่สนใจ ไม่ใส่ใจ  จนกลายเป็น”เด็กหลังห้อง” ถูกพักการเรียนและที่สุดก็ถูกให้ออก เป็นการจบภาระของโรงเรียนโดยไม่ได้ทำงานกับผู้ปกครองจนถึงที่สุ

คิดถึงอ.ศศิธร ไพทีกุลผู้ล่วงลับไปแล้ว เคยบอกว่า  ถ้าเราไม่ช่วยกันจัดการความรุนแรงในโรงเรียนอย่างเหมาะสม   การโยน “ตัวปัญหา” ออกไปนอกโรงเรียนอาจจะ่ช่วยให้โรงเรียนปลอดภัยในระยะสั้นๆ   แต่ถ้าเขาไม่ได้รับการดูแลที่ดี ในที่สุดสังคมจะตกเป็นเหยื่อ … (อย่างที่ Sandy Hook นี่ไง)

และไม่ใช่เฉพาะนักเรียนเท่านั้น  พ่อแม่จำนวนไม่น้อยก็ต้องการความช่วยเหลือด้วยเช่นกัน … ครู โรงเรียน รัฐบาล หน่วยงานไหนจะขานรับเรื่องนี้กันบ้าง?!

ระลึกถึงผู้จากไป ที่ Sandy Hook Elementary School  ภาพจากwww.newswhip.com

Categories
articles Featured Articles

Concept Mapping in a Child Centred Classroom

Concept Mapping in a Child Centred Classroom

By Dr Don W Jordan and Ms Ellen Cornish

Dr Don Jordan and MS Ellen Cornish are regular contributors to sclthailand.org/. Their fourth article provides ideas for teachers who improve or add to their skills in student centred learning.

Don taught in primary schools in Tasmania. His perspective has been enriched by his work with disaffected students in the United Kingdom and with Bachelor of Education students in the Gaza Strip and working with curriculum developers and teachers on behalf of UNICEF in the Maldives.

In March 2011, Don was invited by the Mechai Viravaidya Foundation, to evaluate the leadership, curriculum, resources and teacher training and experience, at the Mechai Pattana Secondary School in north eastern Thailand, in preparation for it to become a demonstration school for the proposed Teacher Training Institute.

Don has a strong interest in the philosophical and theoretical place of computers in primary classrooms in Tasmania, and their effect on students’ learning, behaviour and social development.

Email: donjordan1@bigpond.com

_________________________ ________________________________________________

Ellen Cornish has had 33 years’ experience teaching in Tasmanian schools. She has taught in both primary and district high schools during that time. She has spent time in senior management roles within the school setting. Ellen has also held the positions of treasurer and president of the Early Childhood Educators of Tasmania Association. She has led many professional learning sessions for her colleagues and is skilled in the mentoring and training of pre-qualification teacher trainees, newly qualified teachers and teachers who experience difficulties and those re-entering the profession. Teaching in Korea helped to enrich her experience as an educator.

In March 2011the Mechai Viravaidya Foundation invited her to evaluate the leadership, curriculum, resources and teacher training and experience, at the Mechai Pattana Secondary School in north eastern Thailand. She was also asked to make recommendations for improvements to help bring the school up to the standard required to support the development of a teacher training institute.

She is skilled in providing a creative and challenging program where her students are encouraged to develop their own strengths as well as to take on board responsibility for their own learning and behaviour. She strongly believes that all children can reach their full potential by being given the appropriate guidance within an environment that is non-threatening and one which fosters self-belief. She has expertise in the education of children with disabilities as well as those with challenging behaviour and their ability to function within the mainstream school. One of her passions is to foster creativity in children. In order to facilitate this successfully she has regularly updated her skills by enrolling in professional learning courses. An example of this was a drawing course with the Art School, University of Tasmania.

Concept Mapping in a Child Centred Classroom

Concepts maps (graphic organizers) are powerful classroom strategies that can be used in all phases of learning from brainstorming ideas to presenting findings.

Mind mapping is one of the many powerful graphic organising strategies that can assist teachers with their planning towards a Child Centred Learning classroom, as well as assisting their students to develop creative and critical thinking skills.

Brain storming is central to mind mapping, giving students the opportunity to put forward their ideas. The basis of brainstorming is generating new ideas in a group situation, based on the principle of suspending judgment, where students are encouraged and supported to confidently offer their thoughts and suggestions. Critical thinking skills are essential in helping to evaluate how successful these new ideas are.

The creative and critical thinking potential of a mind map is central to effective brainstorming sessions. Starting with the basic idea as the centre, associations and ideas are generated from it in order to arrive at a large number of different possible approaches. By presenting thoughts and perceptions in a spatial manner and by using colour and pictures, a better overview is gained and new connections can be easily seen.

Writing is an extension of thinking; the brain thinks centrally then branches out, so the way thoughts are organised on paper is significant. To fold a piece of paper in concertina fashion to create a crease for writing is very limiting as information is only presented in a linear way.  The human brain does not work only in a linear way, but works associatively as well as linearly – comparing, integrating and synthesizing as it goes. Association plays a dominant role in nearly every mental function, and words themselves are no exception. Every single word and idea has numerous links attaching it to other ideas and concepts. Mind mapping can allow students to develop other strategies, instead of a strict predetermined linear pathway.

These strategies help students of all ages to better manage learning objectives and achieve academic success. Students are required to evaluate and interpret information from a variety of sources, incorporate new knowledge with what they have learned already, and improve writing and critical thinking skills. Paired with the brain’s capacity for images, visual learning strategies help students better understand and retain information.

Mind maps can be used individually or in large groups. For example, in our classrooms, we found it productive to create a class concept map as a large group both at the beginning of a unit of work and then again at the end, as part of our assessment process. It also proved a useful way to develop a character map while reading a book aloud to the class. These concept maps are particularly useful in activities that require critical thinking skills.

We found in our classrooms that mind mapping helped our students in the following ways;

  • Helps students brainstorm and explore any idea, concept, or problem.
  • Facilitates better understanding of relationships and connections between ideas and concepts.
  • Makes it easier to communicate new ideas and thought processes.
  • Allows students to easily recall information.
  • Helps students take notes and plan tasks for more detailed investigation.
  • Makes it easier to organize ideas and concepts.

It is not enough just to develop a mind map, which is an integral part, but it is only the beginning of the journey, a plan. A mind map does not demonstrate the depth of understanding that students need to develop in order to help them make connections within the topic. Mind maps are used as a beginning strategy to help students navigate their way through their journey on the way to developing a deeper understanding of the topic.

The graphic organiser entitled “Food” included with this article demonstrates the integrating and synthesizing potential of a mind map. This article can be linked to our previous article “Feel Good Feel Great”[1]

 

References

Tony Buzan. http://members.optusnet.com.au/charles57/Creative/Mindmap

[1]  http://sclthailand.org/2011/12/planning-a-unit-of-work-learning-sequences/


Categories
articles Featured Articles

Learning In The MarketLEARNING IN THE MARKET by Jurgen Zimmer

Learning in the Market   by Professor Jurgen Zimmer

Learning in the market means learning amidst insecurity. In every business decision, a risk is inherent. With a wrong decision, economic sanctions will sooner or later come into effect. Good decisions lead ultimately to higher takings. Entrepreneurship is a serious game.

The market is like a school without a schoolhouse, which sometimes manifests itself as an obstacle course, a complex labyrinth, sometimes as a place for lightening-quick decisions, a workshop for tinkerers and inventors, an Ashram for the reception of otherworldly inspiration, an office for unusual measures, a stock exchange of ideas, a show-ground; it allows input from school-less teachers in various roles: as competing entrepreneurs, bureaucrats, managers, business partners, inventors, customers, enemies and friends. The teaching and learning materials stem from reality and are often home-made. This school, having next to nothing in common with the institution of the same name run by educators, finances itself.

Oh yes, and neither are there grades – the customers express their approval or displeasure in Euros and Cents. Exams are no longer short-term events with dubiously little long-term value: the consumers continue to spread their praise or their aspersion. The consumers force entrepreneurs to keep on learning, to constantly gain new competences in their field and produce new ideas. If they take the first early warning signals seriously enough, producers usually have enough time to readjust to the increased or changed demands of their customers before failing to meet the class target – ending with a balanced account sheet. Repeating the grade does happen when entrepreneurs pay too little attention to the market or get out of their depths, but there are no permanent expulsions from this school – new beginnings are also possible. And no one who’s there as an entrepreneur needs to be motivated because they’re motivated already, and the more fascinated they are by the game, the less they worry about timetables and vacation, they want to be there day and night.

Click here to read full article (.pdf)…

 

Categories
articles Featured Articles

Melvin Freestone .

Melvin Freestone

B.A., B.A.(Mod), M.A., H.Dip.Ed., M.Sc.

Consultant for Educational and Community Development

Overview

Educated at University of Dublin, Trinity College, Melvin Freestone has extensive experience in teaching as well as in school and curriculum development in primary and secondary schools. He has held Senior Teaching positions in Ireland and Tasmania.  Until recently he was Principal of Montagu Bay Primary School in Tasmania.

Melvin was Project Leader for the development of the National Statement and Curriculum Profile in Technology Education for the Commonwealth Government of Australia. He has been responsible for numerous curriculum projects in primary and secondary education, science and technology, and personal development. He has played a major role in the development and implementation of ICT for learning in Tasmanian schools. He has also been deeply involved in the Essential Learnings Project and the New Tasmanian Curriculum.

As well as being an experienced educator, he is a molecular biologist who has carried out research into the hospital pathogen Staphylococcus aureus.  He is also a keen sportsperson and has a love of classical music.

Melvin carried out a review of Technology Education in Pacific Rim countries for the OECD’s Pacific Circle Consortium. He has conducted residential programs for primary and secondary teachers in Thailand in association with the University of Tasmania. He is currently working with teachers in Nepal, India, and Thailand.

He has played a leadership role in many community development projects including being a founding member and President of Project Hahn Inc., a member of the Port Arthur Recovery Committee [Tasmania] and has facilitated the development and work of many community organizations.  He has a special interest in the development and provision of wilderness therapy for young people.

Melvin focuses on empowerment of the people with whom he works.  He works collaboratively – ‘at the shoulder’ – with educational leaders, senior staff, teachers, parents and members of school and local communities.  His experience and expertise enhance dialogue and action. 

Categories
articles Featured Articles

Questions….Questions….Questions – Part 3

Part 3

Questions and Teaching

By Melvin Freestone, September 2012.

The role of teachers in ‘learner led’ education shifts to one of facilitator, coach, critical friend, manager, and where appropriate expert. In so doing they help learners to-

  • Connect with the subject matters deemed important for living and working in the twenty first century, including those set out by various curriculum authorities
  • Deepen their thinking and understanding within existing areas of experience as well as engage with new fields inquiry and endeavour
  • Make diverse connections within and between different ideas and practices, and thereby become more innovative and resourceful
  • Become independent and control their own learning without overlooking important issues, ideas, values and skills they need to explore and develop, and
  • Ground their learning in ‘real-life’ contexts and challenges related to their everyday lives.

The challenge for teachers is one of flexibility and agility in facilitating and managing learners to work individually and in groups of varying sizes, and to use available learning spaces well.  Directing learners to different sources, providing input and where appropriate direct teaching are just as important in ‘learner led’ education as they have been at any time in the past.

Focus questions can be used in increasingly sophisticated ways as learning proceeds.  A pattern of progressive development is outlined in the table.

 

Focus question

Progressive Development

 


Making simple connections around factual material and observations from investigations
Searching for explanations and discovering different combinations Exploring interrelationships, consequences, impacts and interventions as well as potential actions Extrapolating explanations, actions, interrelationships and consequences to different contexts
How is it changing? Change can be observed, examined and recorded Change in particular situations has causes and effects Change has consequences that can be predicted and impacts modified

Consequences and impacts of change can vary and be varied in different contexts

What is our responsibility? Actions by individuals and groups affect other people Choices can have positive and negative effects people and systems Informed choices require reliable information, balanced judgements and actions Principles for making balanced judgements and taking action vary in different contexts
What is it like? The features of ‘things’ can be observed and recorded Different aspects of ‘things’ and how they fit together can be explained Relationships between different aspects of ‘things’ can be explained and effects predicted Generalisations about form, structure and design can be applied in different contexts
How does it work? How different aspects of ‘things’ work together can be investigated How different ‘things’ interact with each other can be explained Interactions, sequences and mechanisms within ‘things’ can be explained and predicted Generalisations about the functioning of systems can be applied in different contexts
Why is it like it is? The consequences of ideas and actions can be observed and recorded Causes and effects can be explained and consequences predicted Analysis of causes and effects identifies the value of ideas, actions and means to intervene Generalisations about ‘cause and effect’ can be applied in different contexts and systems
How is it connected to other things? The connections between ‘things’ can be observed, mapped and recorded The way ‘things’ are connected explains their significance, impact and value Interactions within and between ‘things’ can be understood and appropriate action taken Generalisations about interrelationships between systems apply in many contexts
How is it ethical? The worth of things and the values and beliefs behind them can be described Values, cultures, and backgrounds affect how people think and act Values, beliefs and views on the worth of things can change with time and circumstance Generalisations around values-beliefs-worth help in understanding different communities

The range of explorative questions that can be applied in pursuit of focus questions is diverse.  Careful consideration needs to be given to where they might fit into different stages in inquiry processes with the precise language determined by what learners are doing, want to do, can do and need to do.  Consequently, the actual questions posed may be quite distant from the samples of ‘starters’ that follow.

Spotlight on querying samples only

  • What are you assuming?
  • What is ____ assuming?
  • Is there something we could assume instead?
  • You seem to be assuming ____ why?
  • Do I/we understand you correctly?
  • Why are you confident ____ it is right and works?
  • In what ways does your thinking depend on ____?
  • Why have you based you reasoning on ____?
  • Could you explain and justify your reasoning for ____?
  • Is ____ always the case or likely to be the case?
  • Why do you think this ____ holds here?
  • Why should people make this ____ assumption?
  • What are the contradictions in ____?

Spotlight on clarifying samples only

  • What do you mean by ____?
  • Could you use an example to explain ____?
  • What are the main points in ____?
  • Is your basic point ____?
  • Would ____be an example that works for you?
  • In what ways does this ____ relate to ____?
  • Could you explain ____further?
  • Could ____ be put another way?
  • Do you mean ____ or ____ or something different?
  • How does ____relate to what we are trying to do?
  • Would you summarise ____ for us?
  • Could you explain what we should take that to mean?
  • What is the range of issues or things involved in ____?

Spotlight on reasoning samples only

  • What would be an example of ____?
  • How did you come to know and understand ____?
  • Can you explain the evidence for ____?
  • What difference does ____ make to the idea ____?
  • What are your reasons for saying ____?
  • Could you explain your reasons to us?
  • Is there any reason to doubt ____ evidence?
  • Is there any other evidence that could be gathered?
  • Can you explain the thinking in coming to the idea __?
  • How could you find out if __ is right, wrong or just OK?
  • What might to improve our reasoning around ____?
  • Do you think these ____ reasons are adequate?
  • Why do you hold the viewpoint that ____?
  • What led you to believe ____?
  • How does ____ apply in this case?
  • Would more information about ____ help and why?
  • Who is or might be in position to know ____?

Spotlight on viewpoints samples only

  • Which perspective are you coming from on this issue?
  • Why have you chosen ____ perspective?
  • How might others respond to the idea that ____?
  • Why do people hold ____ idea, view or opinion?
  • What is influencing ____ ?
  • How could you respond to the objection that ____?
  • What would someone who believed ____ think?
  • Does everyone see ____ the same way?
  • What would be alternatives ways of looking at ____?
  • Where do the ideas or beliefs that ____ come from?
  • In whose interests is ____?
  • Could any conflicts arise from different viewpoints?
  • In what ways might conflict between ___ be resolved?
  • What strategies are useful resolving these __ conflicts?
  • Who holds ____ views and why?
  • Are there other views and opinions involved in __?
  • What might happen if we combined these ____ views?

Spotlight on consequence samples only

  • What are you implying by ____ ?
  • If ____ happened what else might happen as a result?
  • Why do you think ____ might happen?
  • What effect might ____ have?
  • What is the probability that ____ will happen?
  • What are some alternative possibilities?
  • If ____ were the case then what else must be right?
  • When people say ____ what might they be implying?
  • Can you describe the viewpoints affecting ____ ?
  • How are these ____values and beliefs affecting ____?
  • What is the likely impact of ____?
  • Do you think what might happen from __ is desirable?
  • In what ways is ____ affecting the environment?
  • Could ____ feelings and emotions be involved in ____?
  • How might personal feelings and emotions affect ____
  • If we ___ what do you think is likely outcome or result?

Spotlight on speculation samples only

  • What might happen if ____?
  • Could it be that ____?
  • Could ____ hypothesis explain what is happening?
  • What do you think is likely to happen next?
  • In what ways could ____ be improved?
  • What if we were to redesign it this way ____?
  • Do you think we can modify ____ in some way?
  • Are their better ideas to guide what we should do?
  • Could you come up with a better theory for ____?
  • Do you think ____ might achieve our goals?
  • Are there some ‘stepping stones’ to help our thinking?
  • How might we remake ____ to improve how it works?
  • Can you put forward an argument to dispute ____?
  • Do we need to consider other issues and viewpoints?
  • Could you redesign your ideas and concepts for ____?
  • How might people’s feelings be involved in ____?

Spotlight on ethical issues samples only

  • What do you think the values are behind ____?
  • Is ____ an appropriate way to act or behave?
  • In what ways are values and beliefs involved in ____?
  • How are ____ cultural issues influencing ____?
  • If we say ____ is ethical, is this ____ ethical too?
  • Is it right for people to ____?
  • What is the ethical reasoning behind ____?
  • In what circumstances are ____ ethical reasons OK?
  • Why do you think ____ is not such a good idea
  • Who are the main ‘players’ or groups in ____?
  • In who’s interests is ____ being proposed or promoted?
  • What ethical issues are connected with ____?
  • Why do you think ____ is important?
  • What is the value of ____ idea or ____ action?
  • Do you think it is fair and reasonable to ____?
  • Why do you think ____ is causing so much argument?
  • What would you like to happen in ____ situation?
  • How might personal preferences be involved in ____?

Spotlight on alternatives samples only

  • What are all the questions you can ask about ____?
  • In what ways might we think of ____ of doing it differently?
  • In what ways could ____ be improved?
  • Do other people think the same way about ____?
  • Could you give different explanations for ____?
  • Can you think of new ways for combining ____ ?
  • What if we looked ____ from a different point of view?
  • If ____ is not available what else could we use or do?
  • Could more than one theory explain ____ and why?
  • Why do you think ____ idea is better than ____ idea ?
  • Why is ____ preferable over other ways of doing ____?
  • Do you think this ____ might work better if ____ ?
  • Could you think of a different idea or way to do ____ ?
  • Could ____ or ____ be done in another way?
  • In what ways might personal preferences affect ____?
  • What is the range of emotions involved in ____?
  • How might emotions and feelings be affecting ____?
  • Are there a different ways of handling ____ emotions?

The artistry involved in combining generative questions, focus questions and explorative questions is demanding.  The extract from a teacher’s planning for an inquiry entitled Our Country illustrates how different types of question can be incorporated into an inquiry in a carefully sequenced combination.

Our Country

Introductory performances

  • Pose the generative questionwhat has happened, what is happening, what will happen in the future?.
  • Display issues that emerge as a simple web or mind map on the thinking wall.
  • Negotiate focus questions to shape studies – namely, How is it changing? and Why is it like it is?
  • Have learners gather information and memorabilia or artifacts from home about a historical event.
  • Identify explorative questions from discussion of the generative question and focus questions.
  • Have learners select a topic from our history and define issues – past, present and future – in relation to it.
  • Ask learners to identify sources of information related to the explorative questions they have identified.

Guided performances

  • Have whole class discuss significant events in our history around the focus questions.
  • Require learners choose a significant historical event for detailed investigation.
  • Refine direction for study based on explorative questions, learners’ interests and prior knowledge.
  • Have learners source resources like the Internet, books, newspapers, photos, artefacts, memorabilia…   .
  • Require learners to select and use graphic organisers for displaying information and ‘writing up’ projects.
  • Direct learners to examine causes and effects and predict possibilities in relation to the focus questions.
  • Have learners draw conclusions on how historical events shape the way we act and the way we think.
  • Tease out issues like identity, systems, sustainability and diversity to explain how our country is evolving.

Culminating performances

Require learners to-

  • Create their own fictitious ‘event’ in our country which will become a historical event over time
  • Produce a ‘viewmaster’ display of snippets of history they have researched
  • Present an analytical report in relation to past, present and future possibilities.

Give learners the following ‘instruction’ to guide the presentations of their work.

Using the knowledge you have gained indicate ‘what is happening now’ and make some reasonable assumptions about ‘what might happen’ in the next 50 years.  Your presentation must be about the specific area you researched and you should acknowledge all resources used or referred to in your presentation.  Presentations may be in the form of reports, multimedia productions, slide shows, dramatic role plays, posters, models…, or whatever, and combinations of these.

The pursuit of answers to questions opens up opportunities for working collaboratively with others.  The shared action that results exposes different perceptions of experience, different interpretations, different understandings and different ways of making sense of experience.  Rich learning accrues from appreciation and exploration of these differences.

Collaborative communities of learners generate all kinds of leadership opportunities.  Provided the environment is appreciative and supportive what learners can achieve should be no surprise just a rewarding manifestation of their capabilities.  ‘Natural leaders’, previously hidden, often emerge through shared action, personal recognition and community celebration.

When the burgeoning of computer based resources, often referred to as ICT, is added into the equation some learners may be more up-to-date in a given area than teachers.  Hence the power of knowledge is more evenly shared than when rote learning and didactic teaching dominate.  Yet the need for guidance and expertise from teachers to enable learners to move from ‘novice’ to ‘expert’ remains unchanged.

Building learners’ capacity to ask effective questions is essential for life-long learning.  The personal empowerment gained is huge.

To go to part 1 or 2 of the series, click here.
Part 1 Question and Learning
Part 2 Question and Direction
About the author – Melvin Freestone

 

Categories
articles Featured Articles

Questions….Questions….Questions – Part 1

Part 1

Questions and Learning

By Melvin Freestone, September 2012.

Generative questions are gateways to inquiry, focus questions shape learning and explorative questions direct learning.  Each type of question has a particular value, role and function in learning.  When they are used in combination, they become powerful and empowering beyond words.

By way of analogy – generative questions paint the big picture, focus questions provide the colour and texture, and explorative questions give the detail.  An artist looking at or creating a work of art sees the overall picture at the same time as the detail and nuance.

What are generative questions like?

Generative questions are open-ended and challenging with multiple answers and lines of inquiry.  Theybuild on previous experience and interests, identify relevant prior knowledge and understanding, open up areas for exploration and investigation, focus thinking without cutting off possibilities, promote diverse ways of learning, and integrate learning across different fields.

Generative questions can be applied in all fields of learning as the examples illustrate.

  • Who cares about air and why?
  • What’s the strongest bridge we can make from the pages of a newspaper?
  • In how many different ways can we make up the number 144, 14.4 and 1.44?
  • In what ways could we use the idea of ‘pattern’ to create Art works?
  • How might computer graphics best be incorporated into our multimedia production?
  • What metaphors could we use to help us design a city?
  • In what ways could we reconstruct the fable, the fairy story, the fanciful happening…  ?
  • How might we produce literature that would encourage people to act on ‘climate change’?
  • In what ways are cultures and ethical issues affecting research activity in agriculture?

Questions like these open up learning and as such act as gateways for inquiry.

What are focus questions like?

Focus questions shape learning.  They represent loci around which connections can be made and understandings of the world can be constructed.  Each focus question in the set that follows has been labeled with a key word.  Which one is, or ones are, appropriate for a particular inquiry depends on the subject matter, the purposes behind the inquiry and the learning needs of learners.

  • How is it changing?

Change is the process of movement from one state to another.  It is universal and inevitable.  The key word is Change.

  • What is our responsibility?

People are not passive observers.  They must make choices and in so doing can make a difference.  The key word is Responsibility.

  • What is it like?

Everything has a form with recognisable features which can be observed, identified, described and categorised.  The key word is Form.

  • How does it work?

Everything has a purpose, a role or a way of behaving which can be investigated.  The key word is Function.

  • Why is it like it is?

Things do not just happen.  There are causal relationships at work and actions have consequences.  The key word is Causation.

  • How is it connected to other things?

We live in a world of interacting systems in which the actions of any individual element affect others.  The key word is Connection.

  • How is it ethical?

Ethical reasoning focus attention on the worth of values, ideas and actions and their implications in particular situations.  The key word is Ethical.

 Focus questions are ‘through-lines’ for learning and going on learning throughout life.  Change, responsibility, form, function, causation, connection and ethical – are so fundamental as to be ‘building blocks’ around which learners can cluster the connections they make and thereby construct their understandings.  In this way they can build dynamic networks of connections in their minds: networks that are continually changing with emerging experience and as different patterns and relationships become apparent.

How do explorative questions work?

Explorative questions direct action.  They make it easy for learners to see the kind of thinking required and what they need to do.  A sample of explorative questions addressed by learners at different stages in pursuing the generative question – Who cares about air and why? – follow.

  • Defining Issues

> What are the critical elements involved in maintaining and improving of air quality?

> Why is air quality important?

  • Gathering Information

> What are the most relevant Internet sites we can research to find out about air quality?

> How could we design experiments to test air quality?

  • Devising Alternatives

> In what ways could air quality be improved in outdoor and indoor environments?

> What options for looking after our air quality would be most effective and why?

  • Drawing Conclusions

> Are there any patterns or trends in the information we have collected?

> What is the best explanation of and solution for different problems affecting air quality?

  • Making Judgements

> Can we prioritise actions and their consequences to improve air quality?

> How might we include the steps in our thinking in the PowerPoint or brochure on preventing air pollution?

  • Being fair-minded

> What steps should we take to determine bias and detect false information?

> Were the procedures we used balanced and reasonable?

In ’learner led’ education the questions that really count are those that asked by students.  Avalanches of teacher questions, which have been so prevalent in past practices, followed almost in the same breath by teachers providing the answers needs to be confined to the annals of history.

Wouldn’t it be terrific if learning programs were transformed around questions that resonate with learners and at the same time are derived from the values, understandings, concepts, and skills needed for life and work in modern societies?  Given the current state of the art of education, such an outcome would seem to many people to be just another pipe-dream.  May be one day it might be a different story.

To go to part 2 of the series, click here.
Part 2 Questions and Direction